The administration introduced a new digital hall pass system called Securly Pass, where students to request a pass online and follow strict time limits. While the intent behind this policy is to increase instructional time and reduce hallway disruptions, it has created more problems than it has solved. Securly Pass should be removed because it limits student access to basic needs, increases classroom distractions and promotes a culture of mistrust.
One of the most significant issues with Securly Pass is how it restricts students from meeting their basic needs, such as using the restroom or getting water. In the past, students could step out briefly without much hassle. Now, they must wait for a digital approval and a race against a timer that only allows a few minutes before the pass expires. This delay especially becomes frustrating in emergencies or when a student needs a few extra minutes due to health concerns. Basic human needs should not be regulated this strictly in a learning environment.
Securly Pass also increases distractions in the classroom. Because the system is digital, both students and teachers must constantly monitor their devices to submit or approve passes. This becomes disruptive during instructional time, where switching focus between the computer and the material causes students to lose concentration. Teachers are also pulled away from instruction to manage requests, reset timers, and track who is out. The classroom becomes more about managing pass logistics rather than about focused learning.
Perhaps most concerning, Securly Pass fosters a culture of mistrust by treating all students as potential rule-breakers. While some students may misuse hall passes, the majority follow the rules and return promptly. Instead of addressing the small group of students who create problems, the school has chosen to impose restrictions on everyone. This sends the message that students cannot be trusted with even minor responsibilities, such as leaving the room. Schools should aim to encourage responsibility, not diminish it.
Supporters of Securly Pass argue that it is necessary to prevent skipping, hallway conflicts, and general misuse. While these issues are real, punishing all students to prevent the actions of a few is not a fair or effective approach. Students who intend to skip will find a way to do so regardless, but the students who follow the rules are the ones who are burdened by this policy. A better alternative would be to assign more hallway monitors, identify repeat offenders, and create a more balanced policy that respects students’ needs while maintaining order.
Schools should be places where students are trusted, respected and given the chance to grow. Securly Pass does not support those values. It overregulates basic actions, distracts from learning, and makes students feel like they are constantly under surveillance. Therefore, the administration should remove Securly Pass.
