The Texas Senate passed SB 10 and 11, requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed and allowing prayer time in schools. The House will decide next as supporters say it promotes values and freedom, while critics raise church-state concerns despite optional participation.
Both bills have stirred up heated conversations about religion in public schools. SB 10 would require a 16 inch by 20 inch poster of the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every public school classroom, where it’s clearly visible and legible.
SB 11 would allow students to voluntarily opt in to a designated prayer or religious reflection period, which would not overlap with instructional time. The House should pass both bills, because it upholds the values of moral guidance, religious freedom and personal choice in a way that respects all students, regardless of their beliefs.
At first glance, requiring a display of the Ten Commandments may seem like it imposes a religious agenda. However, many of the Commandments reflect basic moral principles shared across cultures and belief systems. Ideas like honoring parents, telling the truth, and respecting others are universal. By displaying these values in classrooms, there is not enforcement for students to practice a religion, but rather a daily reminder of ethical behavior. In a time when many students struggle with bullying, violence and anxiety, a visible guide to right and wrong can promote a more thoughtful, respectful school environment.
SB 11 takes the principle of religious freedom a step further by giving students time during the day to pray, meditate, or study religious texts if they choose. This is not about favoring one faith over another but rather recognizing that for many students, religion is an important part of their identity and mental health. The bill includes an opt-in system so families can choose whether or not to participate, making it clear that no one is being forced to pray or practice any religion. The bill respects students’ rights to express their beliefs privately and peacefully, just as schools support clubs, athletics, and other personal interests.
Some critics argue that these bills cross the line between church and state. They worry about alienating students who do not share the same beliefs. These are valid concerns, and inclusion matters. However, the bills do not require participation in religious activities, nor do they prioritize one religion over another. The Ten Commandments, while rooted in specific faiths, promote values most people can agree on. A prayer time simply creates space for those who want it and does not pressure anyone to join in. In fact, by making this time optional and structured, schools can avoid coercion and ensure all students are treated fairly.
Supporting these bills is about more than religion. It is about recognizing that public schools serve students from all walks of life, including those who find meaning and support in faith. For students who feel disconnected or overwhelmed, time for spiritual reflection can be a source of strength. For others, the visible presence of moral values can encourage responsibility and respect. Ultimately, these laws give students tools to build character without taking anything away from those who choose not to participate.
Texas has an opportunity to lead by example in promoting values, honoring individual choice and creating educational laws that respect both faith and freedom. The House should pass SB 10 and 11 to help move us in that direction.
